HISTORIC JAMAICA HILLS HOSPITAL MAY BE AFFORDABLE HOUSING WITH SUPPORTING HOUSING – SOUNDS LIKE SOME GHETTO PROJECT HOMELESS SHELTER TO MANY

Though the proposal has not been voted on, the powers to be will not be  happy until they turn the entire SE Queens area into one big homeless shelter and low life community with hood rats running around reeking havoc all over the damn place.

While the talk is for affordable housing, the building if the proposal gets approved will also be supportive housing, the operative word is “supportive housing” which can house mentally ill, drug addicts and homeless. And we know what that would mean for he surrounding area. FUCKING MORE CRAP.

I mean here is this great art-moderne style building designed in 1937 and a chance to turn this into a really nice apartment building for young single professionals and families, but they want to fuck it up with this supportive housing bullshit, which just causes problems in communities. I mean where is Community Board 8 on this issue. I mean, the affordable part is fine, we need more affordable apartments in Queens, but to have some of “supportive housing” is an AWFUL IDEA.  I know I would not want to live in a building that has “supportive housing” and most people feel the same way.

Here are some comments from the article:

Community Board #8 should be ashamed of themselves

 

Another DeBlasio scam to get homeless off the streets. Jamaica already has the highest number of shelters in the ENTIRE city. They say affordable housing now but then once passed they change it. SCAM!!!!!

 

Also the building is loaded with asbestos, which during the renovation will blow and settle on all the people and houses in the neighborhood. Who will pay to clean that, the homeowner that’s who

 

Yes we need affordable housing but the supportive housing is a very very bad idea. We have enough crap going on in the Motel down the block which is now a homeless shelter and we in the neighborhood voted against this.

 

And my buddy in the area had this to say:

 

I’m totally on board with the commenter exposing what BS this project will be. Jamaica does not need another glorified housing project for low life’s. What I heard was that the supportive housing is supposed to be for mentally ill tenants. Sounds like this is going to be a giant homeless shelter. I’ve heard residents in Jamaica Hills are pissed about this and they should be.

 

I just don’t trust these fuckers like Councilman Rory Lancman. Ask him how many fucking supportive housing and homeless shelters he has on his block.
ENOUGH OF THIS BULLSHIT.
—————————————————-

From DNAInfo New York:

Historic Hospital Building Eyed for Affordable Housing in Jamaica Hills

By Ewa Kern-Jedrychowska | December 1, 2016 3:43pm
 The long-vacant former hospital may soon be replaced by affordable and supportive housing.

The long-vacant former hospital may soon be replaced by affordable and supportive housing.

DNAinfo/Ewa Kern-Jedrychowska

QUEENS — A former historic hospital, which has sat empty in the heart of Jamaica Hills for many years, may soon be replaced by affordable and supportive housing, officials said.

Brooklyn-based Dunn Development Corp. has proposed converting the 75-year-old building, located within the Queens Hospital Center complex, into 130 affordable housing units and 75 studio apartments designated for supportive housing, according to Health and Hospitals Corporation (HHC), which operates 11 public hospitals in New York City.

The Art Moderne-style 10-story building at Parsons Boulevard and Goethals Avenue, known as the “T building” for once serving patients with tuberculosis, was designed in 1937 by John Russell Pope, who was also the architect of the Jefferson Memorial in Washington, D.C.

It opened in 1941, but has not been used to treat patients for years. Recently small portions of the building have been used as hospital office space.

Over the past decade, the former Triboro Hospital for Tuberculosis has been the subject of many proposals, including turning it into market rate condominiums.

Some also pushed for its demolition, causing an outcry among architectural preservationists.

Under the proposed plan, Dunn Development will lease the building for 99 years and renovate it, setting aside 12,000 square feet for the hospital’s use, and another 8,000 square feet for use as a community facility in addition to the residential units, according to HHC and Community Board 8.

There will also be on-site social services for residents.

“We are pleased to take this important step to transform the underutilized T Building into a vibrant presence that serves the Queens community,” HHC said in a statement. “The redesign of the former Tuberculosis Hospital will offer modern, affordable, and supportive housing to help residents of the borough live successfully in the community.”

According to the HHC, rents in the building will range between:

• $865 and $1,055 for studios with applicants making $30,994 to $63,500
• $929 and $1,320 for one-bedrooms with applicants making $33,223 to $72,500
• $1,121 and $1,591 for two-bedrooms with applicants making $39,840 to $90,600
• $1,289 and $1,831 for three-bedrooms with applicants making $46,046 to $105,100

Those criteria will not apply to supportive housing where tenants are often selected based on their need for housing and ability to live independently, according to the HHC.

The project, already approved by the HHC’s Board of Directors, was also backed by Community Board 8, despite opposition from some residents of nearby Parkway Village, according to Seymour Schwartz, vice chairman of CB8.

“We are confident in the developer’s proven record of reliability and his commitment to high standards of tenant admissibility and security issues,” Schwartz said, adding that the board has endorsed the plan on condition that the planned community space will provide a variety of programs and activities for residents of all ages.

The proposal still has to be approved by the City Council, according to Schwartz and HHC.

Councilman Rory Lancman, whose support will be pivotal for the project, declined to comment through his spokeswoman.

It was not immediately known when the City Council will vote on the project.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s