Funny, because I have posted many of their articles along with many media outlets articles on my blog that I have made comments about the particular stories, yet never once had DNAInfo said anything in the past. So why this particular post which seemed to have gotten many folks in that area upset, there were many comments on the post, plus tons of outrage on the Clean Up Jamaica Facebook page, so why? Does it have anything to do with Flakes being named in it, I have had said much about Flake before. So what is this issue with DNAInfo.
Of course until some legal action (if there is any), shit does not come down from this blog.
I find this interesting, since many of their articles have been on here and this article is from October, so what is the issue. Interesting. Seems like some of the media is all of a sudden is becoming sensitive to Clean Up Jamaica Queens. Well, you know what DNAInfo New York, take a fucking number. Should be lucky some of us even read some of your shitty stories that pass for journalism.
And also a few Queens media outlets would not publish some of my comments on their stories and the Times Ledger awhile back talked about “some people” in Jamaica’s “rants and occasional ramblings:
Despite occasional grumblings by some locals about the state of things in their neck of the woods, the Jameco Exchange folks have taken a positive attitude, drawing inspiration from the retail vernacular of their two-story storefront and the cobblestone pedestrian mall in which it is situated, as well as the social culture of Jamaica Avenue and the histories of the community.
Who really gives a flying fuck. Well, at least I know people are reading this blog.
To Whom it May Concern:
Our articles cannot be reprinted without our consent. Please remove it immediately.
MICHAEL P. VENTURA | MANAGING EDITOR
DNAinfo.com New York
OFFICE | 646.435.9085
FAX | 646.368.6820
TWITTER | @mpventura